Before fixtures go public

It satisfies every encoded mandatory rule, including availability, precedence, resource exclusivity and required rest. Feasibility is only as complete as the model. Audit the underlying rules, not just the visible calendar.

No. Feasible schedules can distribute rest, early starts and transfers very differently. Fairness needs a stated policy and separate checks. Compare the worst affected paths as well as the average. Review competitive burden.

Check for contradictory inputs and distinguish proven infeasibility from a search ending without a solution. Change a rule or resource only with the appropriate approval. A player window, a predecessor and a room closure can create a contradiction even when there are many apparently empty slots.

Use documented planning durations, reserve operational time and test credible overruns. Publish a delay policy instead of implying that every match has a guaranteed end time. Setup and reset may occupy a room beyond the playing interval.

Not necessarily. Place buffers according to uncertainty, critical dependencies and shared-resource bottlenecks, then test disruption scenarios. A gap in one room may not help a delayed match whose successor needs a different resource.

Include the date and named event time zone, and offer UTC alongside it where useful. Confirm daylight-saving rules for the event date. A named zone such as Europe/Paris is more informative than a fixed offset used without a date.

Only if their required production intervals do not conflict, or the crew has verified capacity for concurrent coverage. Two rooms alone do not establish two-stream capacity. Map shared production resources before adding parallel fixtures.

A named decision owner should approve the repair after competition, venue and production impacts are checked. Publish one revision and notify affected representatives. Record acknowledgements where the change affects imminent commitments. Use the repair sequence.

No. It provides independent educational guidance. The contact tool prepares a report locally for copying or downloading; it does not submit messages or optimize fixtures. You decide whether to send the resulting report using your own email application.